Plagiat oder Propaganda?

March 27, 2020   –   Michael Klein

Das “vertrauliche Strategiepapier” des WDR aus dem Innenministerium

Ist es ein Plagiat oder ist es gezielte Propaganda des Staatsfunk?

„Entscheiden Sie selbst.

“Mit effizientem Testen zum ‘Best Case’”, so lautet der Titel eines Beitrags der Tagesschau vom heutigen Tag. WDR, NDR und die Alpenprawda haben, so heißt es darin, Kenntnis eines “vertraulichen Strategiepapiers” aus dem Bundesinnenministerium erlangt, in dem unter dem Titel “Wie wir Covid-19 unter Kontrolle bekommen”, Südkorea als Vorbild propagiert werden soll.“ (…)

Plagiat oder Propaganda? Das “vertrauliche Strategiepapier” des WDR aus dem Innenministerium

Kommentar GB:

Das in 2012 veröffentlichte Szenario des Bundestages geht von wesentlich längeren Zeiträumen und von höheren Wellen der Pandemie aus. Siehe hierzu:

Risikonalyse Bevölkerungssschutz Bund
Pandemie durch Virus „Modi-SARS“
Deutscher Bundestag 17. Wahlperiode Drs. 17/12051
Stand: 10.12.2012
S. 55 – 88
vor 13 Minuten
bitte googeln: Drucksache 17/1251 ab Seite 55: Das RKI hat bereits in 2012 im Auftrag der damaligen Bundesregierung in gespenstischer Genauigkeit den Ablauf der jetzigen Pandemie durchgespielt und dem Bundestag in 01/2013 vorgestellt. China hat am 31.12.19 der WHO den Epidemiefall mitgeteilt…..und wir haben Karneval gefeiert, erklärt, dass wir alles im Griff haben und dass wir die Infektionsketten kennen…….usw.usw. Keiner hat den Mumm und die Traute gehabt, den Katastrophenfahrplan herauszuziehen und nachzufahren. Ich hoffe, dass diese Situation aufgearbeitet wird, wenn das Schlimmste vorüber ist. Jetzt haben wir andere Prioritäten und meine Gedanken sind bei den Menschen, die um ihr Leben ringen, weil zu wenig Vorsorge getroffen wurde. Wie sagte doch die (fast) Klimaheilige Greta: „Hört auf die Wissenschaft ( und die Ingenieure)!“

sowie:

6 March 2020 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25561/77482 Page 1 of 20
Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand
Neil M Ferguson, Daniel Laydon, Gemma Nedjati-Gilani, Natsuko Imai, Kylie Ainslie, Marc Baguelin, Sangeeta Bhatia, Adhiratha Boonyasiri, Zulma Cucunubá, Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg, Amy Dighe, Ilaria Dorigatti, Han Fu, Katy Gaythorpe, Will Green, Arran Hamlet, Wes Hinsley, Lucy C Okell, Sabine van Elsland, Hayley Thompson, Robert Verity, Erik Volz, Haowei Wang, Yuanrong Wang, Patrick GT Walker, Caroline Walters, Peter Winskill, Charles Whittaker, Christl A Donnelly, Steven Riley, Azra C Ghani.
On behalf of the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team
WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Modelling MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics Imperial College London
Correspondence: neil.ferguson@imperial.ac.uk
Summary
The global impact of COVID-19 has been profound, and the public health threat it represents is the most serious seen in a respiratory virus since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Here we present the results of epidemiological modelling which has informed policymaking in the UK and other countries in recent weeks. In the absence of a COVID-19 vaccine, we assess the potential role of a number of public health measures – so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) – aimed at reducing contact rates in the population and thereby reducing transmission of the virus. In the results presented here, we apply a previously published microsimulation model to two countries: the UK (Great Britain specifically) and the US. We conclude that the effectiveness of any one intervention in isolation is likely to be limited, requiring multiple interventions to be combined to have a substantial impact on transmission.
Two fundamental strategies are possible: (a) mitigation, which focuses on slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread – reducing peak healthcare demand while protecting those most at risk of severe disease from infection, and (b) suppression, which aims to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that situation indefinitely. Each policy has major challenges. We find that that optimal mitigation policies (combining home isolation of suspect cases, home quarantine of those living in the same household as suspect cases, and social distancing of the elderly and others at most risk of severe disease) might reduce peak healthcare demand by 2/3 and deaths by half. However, the resulting mitigated epidemic would still likely result in hundreds of thousands of deaths and health systems (most notably intensive care units) being overwhelmed many times over. For countries able to achieve it, this leaves suppression as the preferred policy option.
We show that in the UK and US context, suppression will minimally require a combination of social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members. This may need to be supplemented by school and university closures, though it should be recognised that such closures may have negative impacts on health systems due to increased
16 March 2020 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25561/77482 Page 2 of 20
absenteeism. The major challenge of suppression is that this type of intensive intervention package – or something equivalently effective at reducing transmission – will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available (potentially 18 months or more) – given that we predict that transmission will quickly rebound if interventions are relaxed. We show that intermittent social distancing – triggered by trends in disease surveillance – may allow interventions to be relaxed temporarily in relative short time windows, but measures will need to be reintroduced if or when case numbers rebound. Last, while experience in China and now South Korea show that suppression is possible in the short term, it remains to be seen whether it is possible long-term, and whether the social and economic costs of the interventions adopted thus far can be reduced.

link in:

https://www.rbb24.de/panorama/thema/2020/coronavirus/service/faelle-berlin-brandenburg-verdopplungszeit-fallzahlen-entwicklung.html